PEER REVIEW POLICY

Journal of Islamic Economics and Inclusive Finance applies a double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and academic rigor of all published articles. In this process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed to maintain objectivity and minimize potential bias. Every manuscript submitted to the journal is initially evaluated by the editorial team to assess its suitability with the journal’s focus and scope, originality, and compliance with submission guidelines.

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are then reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on scholarly merit, methodological soundness, originality, clarity of presentation, and contribution to the development of Islamic economics and inclusive finance. Based on the reviewers’ recommendations, the editor may decide to accept the manuscript, request minor or major revisions, or reject the submission. Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers’ comments within the specified timeframe. The final decision regarding publication rests with the Editor-in-Chief, and all review processes are conducted in accordance with ethical publishing standards and academic integrity principles.